“So, why do you do it?”
“It isn’t planned.”
“But you know that you are uploading the pic. So, how does that happen? What makes you do it?”
“Perhaps I want to put myself up there by removing myself from me.”
“So you objectify yourself?”
“One gets objectified anyway by others.”
“Why do you want to play their game?”
“It isn't the same. They see disembodied parts. Eyes, mouth, nose, neck, breasts, waist, hips, hands, fingers.”
“And you are not? You are doing precisely that.”
“I am turning this objectification on its head. If you notice, I have distorted as well. I do make a statement. In my put up ‘parts’, I made a cross over it, essentially saying this is cut out, deleted, unimportant.”
“So you are reducing yourself?”
“I am reducing the idea of the Self as parts.”
“Who is going to see the metaphysical when the physical hits you first?”
"I know I am not a Barbie; you cannot just put a key in me and get me started. That level of self-esteem is there, which is why it is possible for me to do what I do. That is also the reason I do not feel devastated by feministic critiques that tend to be hugely one-dimensional.”
“The question remains: will anyone get it?”
“That’s not important. Seeing something is of the senses; understanding requires more. Besides, don’t people visualise things?”
“I still feel there are pitfalls here. Recall that line from a song, “Eik taraf iskq hai tanha-tanha, eik taraf husn hai ruswaa-ruswaa”. It can become a cause for humiliation.”
“One does not have to put parts of oneself to invite humiliation. People find ruses – words, actions, shared moments, confidences, the past, the present…everything becomes removed from the person one is. I do not fear the kind of humiliation that comes with putting up these ‘objects’ because I have control over them. They are truly mine and do not need the crutch of another.”
“I see you have put up one more.”
“Yes, I took this on 28th night on a whim, just bent my head a bit. The yellow light in the foreground ‘hit’ the hair…I found the result conveyed something that might be in a shop window selling hair pieces. But, and there is a big but, that flash of eye makes it human.”
“More reason to be concerned. The hair is not just hair, it is yours. Therefore, you are in the shop window.”
“In a sense, we all are. I write in this public space. People might go window surfing and chance upon this blog. They will check out what they see first, and then if they like it, they will probe further. If they continue they will stay on and visit often.”
“But if they bought you, then you would not be here still!”
“It is an exhibition area…it is to look, not buy.”
“Is looking not objectification?”
“Of course, it is. But it depends on the way of seeing. And perceiving. Besides, to take the example of the photograph, it is how the hair looked on that particular day, that moment, under those lights. Therefore, it isn’t really the complete picture.”
“A part of a part?”
“One truth of one part. There can be several truths.”
“As in truth is relative?”
“Also, the truth has to work within the parameters of several lies, so it breaks itself up into several truths.”
“Can truth be objectified?”
“It can be ‘subjectified’ to fit into our worldview. Therefore, what we call objectification is what I see as ‘subjectification’. As subject I do not fall prey as object because I have the benefit of a conscious decision. This exhibit can raise hell, so to speak.”

