Why should Praveen
Togadia be arrested for some hate speech? I wish people would not be so
narrow-minded and try listening carefully. In a democratic country, not only
does he exercise his right to free speech but his words can prove to be
valuable evidence. Yes. The brave man has just put his hand in the alligator’s
mouth. Now it is upto the authorities to register his speech not on grounds of
hate or that ridiculous “causing enmity between two communities”, but because
he has accepted culpability, that minorities were killed.
Some people are
saying he ought to be arrested just as MIM leader Akbaruddin Owaisi was for his
incendiary speech in Hyderabad last month. Owaisi has a position; Togadia does
not – he is the proverbial harlot with the privilege of power without responsibility.
(It is also important to note that a few Muslims filed a case against Owaisi.)
Togadia’s
arrested development needs to be examined rather than caged. I watched this part of the speech
and, to be honest, had some bits not been about tragic events, it is pure
pantomime. That the International Secretary of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad – I had
earlier wondered whether his job profile meant trying to get funds from
overseas to prop up our ancient heritage – should feel the need to respond to
Owaisi reveals insecurity. Like all insecure people, he plays up others’
deficiencies to show that what he stands for is superior.
He talks about
communal riots with glee:
“Woh Assam mein….Nelli…teen hazaar laashein thi unme, miyan, Hindu ki laash eik bhi nahin thi… Bhagalpur ke nazdeek Ganga behti hai, laashein hi laashein thi…gin nahin paaye…unme eik bhi laash Hindu ki nahin thi…Aisa hi UP mein…Meerut mein Moradabad mein hua, arre Gujarat mein police khadi thi, dekho kya hua…”
(In Nelli, Assam 3000 were killed, but Miyan, not one Hindu. Near Bhagalpur where the Ganga flows, there were bodies upon bodies, but not one was Hindu. The same in UP’s Meerut, Moradabad…and in Gujarat the cops were there and yet what happened…)
His organisation
is closely associated with the BJP that rules in some states and is the largest
Opposition Party in India. The VHP, like the RSS, has always provided tactical
support as well as been an intrinsic part of the brainstorming sessions (more
on that later). He is saying quite forcefully that these killings during riots
were the handiwork of Hindutva groups. In Gujarat he has openly implicated the
police. Will the BJP just call him a big mouth and continue to be in denial of
its role in these riots?
The party has a
master strategy of using its satellites as foot soldiers when it wants to put
on its moderate face. However, it is time to use this as a record. Unless, of
course, the BJP decides to push for the arrest of Praveen Togadia. This is
unlikely, and as always it will use its ‘action-reaction’ argument.
We should go
beyond politics and just as the majority of Muslims who were not at Owaisi’s
rally did not find his speech rousing or amusing, only those Hindus who were at
Togadia’s rally were laughing. Or, perhaps those in the web world using their
anonymity to get a high they lack in real life.
There is, however,
one serious issue here. Togadia may be a backroom boy, but the BJP has never
distanced itself from him. This lends him legitimacy by default. Given the
manner in which minorityism is being viewed almost everywhere, these words
having some sort of subliminal impact on the reasonable and the rational cannot
be ruled out. I have maintained that Syed Shahabuddin can be more dangerous than
the Imam of Jama Masjid.
We have been
watching how Subramaniam Swamy with all his Ivy League credentials has taken it
upon himself to make Muslims admit to their Hindu ancestry. This has got a lot
of mileage, although the late K. Sudarshan of the RSS had said this many years
ago. Now, Togadia raised the same subject in his speech when he called Muslims
cowards who left Hinduism: “Kaayaron Hindu
dharm chhod ke chale gaye…”
Next time the
saffron parties use this word, they will have to remember never to talk about
Mahatma Gandhi again, for he had famously said, “The Hindu is a coward, the
Muslim a bully.”
So, who is the
coward and who is the bully? Do social interaction and the nation’s Constitution
take cognisance of such terms? Is Togadia trying to possibly proselytise? How
does one become a Hindu when they say Hinduism is a way of life? Every religion
has scriptures and rituals and places of worship. If it were a way of life,
people would not need those.
And Togadia
forgets what he said a couple of years ago:
“SIT has called me because I am a Hindu. No Hindu in Gujarat is safe. In this country, Hindu saints, temples, organisations are targets of jihadis.”
So, is the
coward on the rebound? The pugnacity of Togadia is seeking sanction from a wider
variety. He is performing a soap opera. He is targeting the female population:
“Ma Durga bhavani ka dharm hai…humne apni maataon ke haath mein belan dekha hoga, aaina dekha hai, lipstick dekhi hai, pressure cooker dekha hai, washing machine dekha hai. Durga maa ke haath mein belan nahin…meri Durga Bhavani ke haath mein yadee talwar nahin tau Durga Bhavani nahin hai…”
(This is the faith of Goddess Durga. We have seen our mothers with rolling pin, mirror, lipstick, pressure cooker, washing machine. Durga does not have these. If there is no sword in her hand, then she is no Durga.)
It would be
interesting to see what all these godmen who have been making expert comments
on everything from women’s clothes to rape in the most sexist manner have to
say to this ‘feminist’ tripe of Togadia. Indira Gandhi was called Durga; so is
Mamata Bannerjee. No woman from the BJP or its acolytes has been given this
honour.
Will we see
homemakers internalising the war cry and imagining they have slaughtered the
chapattis with the rolling pin?
More
importantly, is the BJP going to distance itself from the Togadia? Impossible. For, on February 7, the BJP’s poster boy
Narendra Modi is to attend a meeting organised by the VHP at the Allahabad
Mahakumbh. Starting tomorrow, it is a two-day event of seers, who will decide
whether they want to endorse NaMo as PM candidate for the BJP. The report says
that it might not go all the way and the “sant samaj (the order of monks) might
extend its blessings to Modi”.
Further, the report
states:
If the seers support Modi’s candidature, there will be pressure on the BJP’s central leadership to declare him as their candidate. However, Sources said that even after the saints’ endorsement, BJP’s parliamentary board might stop short of announcing anyone as its candidate for now, keeping alliance partners in mind. But, the party expects that saints’ open support to Modi will help get Hindu votes.
Ergo, the BJP
cannot move an inch without its major backers. This is where Praveen Togadia’s statements
could prove to be Modi’s nemesis. But that would be in a world where justice
prevailed and not where a supposedly brilliant politician who is changing the
face of his state willingly opts to be at the mercy of sadhus and stunts.
(c) Farzana Versey
My open letter in 2010: Dear Praveen Bhai Togadia
(c) Farzana Versey
My open letter in 2010: Dear Praveen Bhai Togadia

3 comments:
RSS' strategy is brilliant. If their member is arrested for crime or terror, they simply say 'He had left us long back. So many people keep coming to us and leaving'.
If asked how come someone attend their Shakhas and be functionary they say, "We don't keep register of membership records".
So no matter how many extremists or terrorists are caught from their ranks, RSS remains clean.
Further, cops and agencies also buy this claim by the self-styled patriotic (and cultural) organization.
Indscribe:
Absolutely. But, sometimes they don't even need to pretend. The cops and official machinery is with them.
FV,
QUOTE: "...is the BJP going to distance itself from the Togadia?"
Have Indian Muslims ever distanced themselves from Hindu-hating Mughal (and other) rulers? Has a single Indian Muslim called for demolition of all those mosques constructed on ruins of defiled temples? Has Daul Uloom Deoband ever demanded that that Gyan Vapi mosque is unislamic and should be abandoned by Muslims so that the Kashi Vishweshwar temple can be restored?
Since the answer to each is 'No', will it be correct to assume that Indian Muslims support these acts?
Your logic, not mine!
Post a Comment