15.5.13

Is Rahul Gandhi worth 1000 bucks?



Would we have heard about Kaushal Shakya had Rahul Gandhi not handed him a Rs 1000 note?

If this is a PR exercise, then why is the media falling for it? Websites like Firstpost come out with supposedly weighty analysis, but fall in their own trap. It writes, beginning with the quote of the 11-year-old, who happens to be a news hawker:

“Akbar leejye. Aap hi ki khabar hai (Please buy the paper. It’s news about you in it)."

Now, if the PR was so good, it would not find a boy trying to sell a paper with news about Rahul Gandhi. This would be a dead giveaway. But, we are not done yet:

“It happened when Rahul’s motorcade was stopped at a traffic light in Bhopal (Really? The Rahul motorcade stops for lights? And a newspaper vendor is allowed to get that close to the crown prince?)"

Usually, it does not. Unless, the intention is to be 'one with the people', and since Firstpost has decided that this is “empty symbolism", anything can happen. So why are they surprised? Besides, this whole “crown prince" is getting to be a bit lame, just as referring to him as Rahul baba in op-ed pieces is. It reveals more about those writing than about him. And just a reminder: his father Rajiv Gandhi got killed when the junta was allowed to get close to him.

One may call this populism, but which leader does not resort to it?

Now let us return to the boy:

“Rahul asked him instead why he was not in school. Moved by the boy’s story about wanting to be a doctor but having to help out his family of five, Rahul offered him a 1000-rupee note."

Often, young kids who are peddling stuff insist you buy, and if you say you don't what or need it, they say, "Kuchch paisa de do, bhookh lagi hai (give me some money then, I am hungry)". This is the sad reality. And I know many people who do hand out money. This is not all. At the fancier hotels, the real babalog give big money to the durbans and the valets for parking their wheels.

The holier-than-thou attitude transposes another Congressman who said “If Rahulji could give the boy Rs 1000 from his wallet, I would be delighted to fund his education.”

For the news purveyors, it is just a story with the protagonist as “the master of the meaningless gesture".

Rahul Gandhi has money, and he knows that this amount won't take the boy far, but there are ridiculous suggestions elsewhere that he should have not assumed the kid would have change, or that others with him could have offered the money.

Does it matter? One boy went away with some cash that made him happy. "Now he has been offered a monthly stipend of Rs 1000 and a seat in a private medical college after he finishes school."

If you give Rahul publicity for it, then it is your problem. You want to discuss macro issues, then do so. Don't use a crutch for it. Kaushal did not grab the note, as much as some in the media grab opportunities, and in fact “demurred". That is when Rahul told him, “Please keep it. Become a doctor. Never let your dreams die.”

Even Rahul Gandhi would know that this amount won't take him far. What kind of asinine thinking is it to question someone who tells someone to dream?

I once gave a young beggar some money, a little more than the usual loose change, and asked him to buy a few things that he could sell. I did not know about his dreams, but I was hoping it would at least be a first step towards earning rather than begging. So, heck, yes. It was a gesture.

The barrage against Rahul continued:

“It’s an odd statement from a man whose own dreams seem so fuzzily and obstinately opaque even to the party that’s hitched its wagon to him. He is the posterchild for the man who is living someone else’s dream."

Indeed, the party has hitched its wagon to him. Let us recall other parties and their 'hopes' and their posterboys. And whose dream is he living? If he was, he would have already been the prime minister. These supposedly smart statements do not convey anything.

Pick on Rahul Gandhi for his political naïveté, and even his dinner with Dalits. But, getting personal is 'symbolic' of a lack of argument. As empty as that which is being critiqued.

© Farzana Versey

---

Image: Faking News

6 comments:

  1. FV, The day Rahul Gandhi opens his mouth has an opinion on some topic of import will be the day it would be worth paying attention to that joker. I fail to see why he attracts so much attention when he has so little to say, and even less to show (such as his abyssmal record in parliament...all he had to do was show up and he couldn't manage that apparently). It just seems to me that he is a front for a lot of crooks and criminals who are also his sycophants - people who don't mind Rahul getting all the publicity as long as it gets them a seat in politics, which is worth a lot of money nowadays, going by how rapidly the wealth of people in politics seems to rise. All very yawnworthy.

    -Al

    ReplyDelete
  2. Al:

    You are assuming that he is the only one who has sycophants and has not performed. He is not a minister.

    Of course, he does not have much to say, but with all parties getting media attention almost equally for doings and non doings, a large part of the blame lies with the news purveyors.

    If it is all yawn worthy, you seem to have reacted with quite a bit of alertness:-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. FV: "Of course, he does not have much to say, but with all parties getting media attention almost equally for doings and non doings, a large part of the blame lies with the news purveyors. "

    Well, he's a tad worse than that. He has no reasonable response to pointed questions -- he follows the old trick of responding with a question rather than give some answer indicating his general line of thinking. I recall seeing him with vinton cerf where someone in the audience asked him how be plans to harness the internet for improving education since he had mentioned it in his speech. His response was: "what are you going to do about it?" to which the questioner pointed out that if he was empowered or knew the answer to that question, he wouldn't have asked it in the first place.

    ""If it is all yawn worthy, you seem to have reacted with quite a bit of alertness:-)"

    Not really, just irritates me to have to read about that imbecile. That'all.

    -Al

    ReplyDelete
  4. Al:

    Oh well, I just see more imbeciles and most certainly do not think that smart answers necessarily mean great leadership.

    I needn't have to emphasise that RG isn't one of my favourite people, but it's fun while it lasts.

    And skip stuff that irritates beyond a limit.

    PS: I am meditating these days!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wonder if people can see through the emptiness of these gestures. It is true that all politicians make empty gestures so we can't hold this against him. He is playing the same game.
    I am hoping that with increased awareness and knowledge of people some positive changes will start happening. The politicians will only respond to what people demand and the nature of response will depend on the kind of demands being made.

    ReplyDelete
  6. { The politicians will only respond to what people demand and the nature of response will depend on the kind of demands being made.}

    Not quite. We aren't yet Utopia.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.