tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16761020.post5989145002967072858..comments2023-10-20T21:52:36.752+05:30Comments on Cross Connections: Sunday ka FundaFarzana Verseyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06891229615361937135noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16761020.post-24210459973801750332014-01-14T22:01:22.233+05:302014-01-14T22:01:22.233+05:30Manish:
The link has details of the study, which ...Manish:<br /><br />The link has details of the study, which is in fact restrictive even as far as the sample goes. Also, as mentioned, the media played it further up as a "middle eastern" thing. Such ignorance is galling. <br /><br />I don't entirely agree that conclusions from stats are a matter of perspective. At least not if it lacks nuance. For example, in this post there is a pointing out of error zones, and the stereotypical notions. If clothing is associated with religion, we do not see studies on other faiths. And that is the reason the other chart, facile as it is, helps show up the facetiousness. <br /><br />{someone very sorted i know said ..islam mein daadhi hai ...daadhi mein islam nahin hai}<br /><br />Time to check out the Commie beards, too!FVnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16761020.post-40671686727581545132014-01-13T00:18:57.220+05:302014-01-13T00:18:57.220+05:30FV,
My 2 cents, the statistical methods are pretty...FV,<br />My 2 cents, the statistical methods are pretty clearly defined on choosing the sample size,predicting margin of error and software applications make them almost "idiotproof" so to conclude that the study in discussion lacks statistical merit will be a little far fetched . <br />That said, conclusions out of statistics are a function of the individual's perspectives .my personal observation is that more people connect sense of clothing with religion , reality may be to the contrary ...someone very sorted i know said ...islam mein daadhi hai ...daadhi mein islam nahin hai .... ManishAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com