They still won’t call him a terrorist. Anders Breivik remains a “right wing extremist gunman” and, with some concessional nod of late, an “anti-Muslim fanatic”. I feel that the trial is projecting his views in a circular light where despite what he has done, the emphasis will be on the statement made during the defence. It will work subliminally, for those he killed were not specifically Muslim targets. This would push the general sympathy idea and divert his motives.
He has displayed arrogance throughout. As a report says:
Norwegian killer Breivik breaks down as film of his hero Vlad the Impaler is played (but stays stony-faced as court describes way he slaughtered 77).
He smirked several times as the cuffs were removed, put his right fist on his heart then extended his hand in salute. “I do not recognise the Norwegian courts. You have received your mandate from political parties which support multiculturalism,” Breivik told the court after refusing to stand when judges entered.
“I acknowledge the acts but not criminal guilt as I claim self defence,” he added, seated in front of a bulletproof glass wall.
His self-defence was against “Muslims”.
|The patch on his uniform|
The Norwegian police plan to bring his mother Wenche Behring to the witness box because Breivik said during interviews:
“I just hope my mother is not there. She’s the only one who can make me emotionally unstable. She is my Achilles heel.”
They courts believe that seeing her will “reduce the killer to a quivering wreck”. This is ridiculous, for she has already stated that her son suffered from paranoid delusions five years ago. Why was he not treated for it? The insanity plea might work. And he might well be her Achilles heel.
All killers suffer from some psychological issues, and the ‘lone murderer’ or a group of terrorists being brainwashed is part of how the enemy is played on their minds subconsciously.
It is the job of the courts and the police to conduct the proceedings. I am surprised that such ‘motherly’ intervention is being made public. We are not dealing with a juvenile court. The man went on a killing spree, his acts are recorded, he has admitted to it. What more do they want to know? That he watched a Muslim running a store and it affected his mind so much that he decided to attack innocent people?
He is a terrorist, and not just Norway but all the western powers should treat him as such.
Also from my archives:
They don’t have terrorists in Norway?
Did Hindu or Islamic Fundamentalism inspire Oslo’s Terrorist?
If this right-wing extremist gunner was in Florida I'm sure he'd go free using the "Stand Your Ground" defense.ReplyDelete
FV - I was using 'gunner' as a synonym for killer. But I agree, Breivik is a terrorist.ReplyDelete
Ok. Thanks. It's just one of the things I am emphasise.