Mumbai blasts. Wednesday, July 13. Time 6.50-7.00 pm. Within ten minutes three densely populated areas of the city were targeted. (There is some information that the timeframe was longer, contradicting reports.) This was coordinated despite the places being not in close proximity - Zaveri Bazaar, Dadar Kabutarkhana and Opera House. 21 people have died and 113 injured according to the last reports.
Gruesome pictures are being posted. Will it solve the case or just add spice to the tragedy?
Worse, politicians, the media and public had open access to the areas and were walking around them. The police had not placed barricades in time and crucial evidence could be lost.
A few points:
1. Why are political groups and people demanding to know who is behind it when the chief minister and home minister have already announced it is a terrorist attack?
2. Why are some people connecting it with the November 2008 attacks?
3. Why is it that each time there is a terrorist attack in India people are asked to maintain communal harmony? Can we not make a bloody difference between the two aspects?
4. News channels have emphasised that the areas were mainly populated by Gujarati businessmen. Dadar is not. And there are others working in these places. Unless there is information that the idea was to target Gujarati businessmen, such information is counterproductive. Does it not negate the call for harmony?
5. How important is it for celebrities to be quoted barely a couple of hours later condemning the attack?
6. The helpline numbers and blood donations should be used only by those and for those in need. Choking hospitals won't help.
7. Why are some people smirking over how there will now be conspiracy theories? The fact is that such acts are conspiracies.
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.