17.10.06

Mohammed Afzal ko ghussa kyon nahin aata?

Whoopee! Two of the biggest cuckoo cases have jumped onto the ‘Guru ho ja shuroo’ bandwagon.

Instead of reading Urdu novels and the Quran in prison, Mohammed Afzal Guru ought to display some fire and ask some of the siyaasatdars to lay off.

Tomorrow, Rahul Mahajan, son of late BJP leader Pramod Mahajan, will sit in a protest rally, looking very committed and innocent, to press for the death sentence on Afzal Guru for his role in the Parliament attack case. "I feel Afzal should be hanged and to register my protest against those seeking pardon for him, I will sit on a dharna," he said.

Rahul has a case in court against him for a drug binge in which his father’s secretary died under mysterious circumstances, he was himself put in prison and is now out on bail and a few others (including a Kashmiri whose credentials are said to be iffy) were arrested.

Since the case is sub judice, how can he be given the right to protest in a political matter? "From the same venue, Mahatma Gandhi had given Quit India slogan in 1942 against the British. Similarly, we will be asking terrorists to leave India.”

Who is the ‘we’? If he is doing so as a voice of the party, then will the BJP please tell us what position he holds and that he has yet to prove his innocence? If the ‘we’ is the people, then who are the people? We need to know.

It is also so convenient bringing in Mahatma Gandhi. And it is very sweet of him to ‘ask’ terrorists to leave India. But what happens to the ghar ki murgis? Are home-grown local ‘boys’ not to be considered? They are Indian citizens, just like him. He should start with the Gujarat CM, since he is apna aadmi, then we can move to the fellows who indulged in yesterday’s shootout in Mumbai and killed two men, including one police informant. Then we go South, then East, then further North East, then North…

And then he might also like to deal with the fixers within his own party that shamelessly make deals with those they call terrorists.
* * *
The other politically-motivated guy is Dr. Farooq Abdullah. (He and Ghulam Nabi Azad must be banned from entering J&K.) Is this the way to fight for Afzal’s case in the manner in which he has been going about it? He said, “You want to hang him? Go ahead and hang him. But the consequences of hanging him must also be remembered. One of the consequences will be... we have paid the price of Maqbool Butt’s hanging by the judge who was shot in Kashmir. Those judges will need to be protected like anything.”

Fool. He should do what he is best at – go to London and play golf and return to the Valley only when he has to take film stars (the oh-so-conscious-of-my-social-responsibilities Ms. Shabana Azmi, if you please) pillion riding on his motorbike.

This just about suits him. He has not done a thing to solve the problems of the Kashmiris and happily slept with the NDA combine to "bring peace". Har-har…

By making such silly statements, he is impressing no one and impressing upon no one.

Judges have been shot at in courtrooms by goondas and the underworld too. And people in the public eye in controversial cases are always at risk. That is the reason our country has Z or is it “Zzzzz” security.

He also said the nation would go up in flames. This is the language Bal Thackeray uses all the time, and of course everyone just indulges him; some even feel he is right. Farooq Abdullah should find better inspiration for his dramabaazi.
* * *
Talking of drama, on Monday (Oct. 16) the local BJP unit in Rajkot organised a play, enacting the hanging of Mohammad Afzal Guru to highlight the party's protest against his clemency demand.

A former BJP MP said, “One, who killed nine persons in the Parliament attack, should be hanged without delay.”

How do they become MPs? Afzal killed no one. What he did is in the court papers, but on that day he fiddled around while Parliament was attacked, just like Modibhai did during the riots.

3 comments:

  1. In spite of your education and modern views, You are demonstrating that there are lumps of fundamentalism in you; You, without your own knowledge are biased; This is the problem even with intellectuals in your community.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem with people like you (whoever you are), is that you do not back up your stmts. You believe that having uttered the word 'fundamentalism' you can pin someone down. Well, this one does not get pinned. You cannot stand the idea that there are educated Muslims with modern views; it really upsets your stereotyped apple-cart.

    May I have the pleasure of informing you that when I, and I assume many others, address anyone directly we do not say "your community". By using such terminology you expose yourself. Thank you for that.

    The fact is you could not see I have spoken out against the so-called intellectuals and secularists within the community.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Since the case is sub judice, how can he be given the right to protest in a political matter?"

    Funny comment. Is there any law that requires that an individual not make any political statements if a case is pending against him?

    "Who is the ‘we’? We meams all those who are against terrorism. Rahul is speaking for those who want to see Afzal hanged."

    "He should start with the Gujarat CM, since he is apna aadmi, then we can move to the fellows who indulged in yesterday’s shootout in Mumbai and killed two men, including one police informant."

    Gujarat CM is not a terrorist like Afzal. Don't mix up issues. Afzal is a terrorist, even the courts have found him guilty. We are talking terrorism here, not riots. Intellectuals should be able to make the distinction between the two issues. It reflects poorly on a person's IQ if that person cannot make distinguish one issue from another.

    "then we can move to the fellows who indulged in yesterday’s shootout in Mumbai and killed two men, including one police informant. Then we go South, then East, then further North East, then North…"
    Same problem again. THe issue is terrorism, not your usual underworld shoot-out.

    "And then he might also like to deal with the fixers within his own party that shamelessly make deals with those they call terrorists."

    I think you are referring to the Kandahar episode. There were more than 300 Indians who were taken hostage. The government had to make the deal to save the hostages. It was done under duress and under extenuating circumstances. It was the right thing to do under the circumstances and the BJP cannot be faulted for the decision.

    "just like Modibhai did during the riots."

    Modibhai acted faster than Rajiv Bofors Gandhi did during the anti-Sikh riots and saved more lives than the secular(Islamic) Congress non-government. Of course this being an Islamic country, courtsey the Islamic Congress party, the media played it up the Gujarat riots and made a big noise against the BJP.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.