Showing posts with label cliches. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cliches. Show all posts

29.9.12

Bollywood’s Killing Fields


Her life is pornography. Even as their bare bodies are entwined for a few minutes of pleasure, Mahi Arora is capturing the scene on her camera.

I know a wannabe Mahi from years ago. Strange hands splashed whipped cream in her cleavage, crawling higher and lower than needed, the movements robotic. There was awkwardness in her demeanour. I watched this helplessly at a photographer’s studio. The girl and I both rookies, our silences bought by fake dreams. She was a struggling actress and I was there to capture that struggle, write about it, take the message to the world. I felt like a lowlife. And when I did speak, the response hit me: “We are preparing her for the movies.”

This was foreplay where everyone wanted to be a part of what might be a success story. Kingmakers, rag makers stitching clothes so close to the skin that the needles poked into pores. 

***

The film Heroine has been panned by critics because it uses clichés. By turning away from clichés we often lose out on truth. It is superficial in parts because Bollywood is superficial.

The casting couch is a reality few want to accept even if they have made the mandatory visit to The Permanent Suite.  After the first time, it ceases to be about sex or even power. The “heroine ka rate-card” reveals how she is being degraded to fight for every endorsement, party invitation, paid guest appearance at some rich person’s wedding as the bride’s friend and not a celebrity. The diva is now a hanger-on, acting that part in real life so that she can retain the title of superstar.

I wept during the film not because Kareena Kapoor has torn every emotion to reveal shreds, but because I thought about whipped-cream Shanti. A name so common it had to be changed. It did not alter her destiny. Her foundation lay thick on the face, ending at the jawline, revealing another shade of neck. She was the tacky adornment in a few films that released in seedy cinema halls. Then, she disappeared.

I saw her a while ago at a televised award function. She was clapping away, her makeup a bit garish but not gauche, and a new body that she could afford to buy. Her rate-card had been made. She did not need to act anymore. Her applause was genuine. It was for a contemporary who had made it. She knew what their respective prices were. This was happiness projected.  

***

Every day brings a new story of desperate measures to seek attention. Some years ago when I read about a starlet’s tale of woe, I knew there was something amiss. She called up a newspaper office in an agitated state to talk about a photographer who was blackmailing her. She said, “The pictures were taken of me in a bathtub, but there was no indecent exposure. It’s no big deal, but I just felt they should not be published anywhere.”

So why was she making a big deal of it? If she believed that a picture in a bathtub did not constitute indecent exposure, then what was she worried about? Nobody pushed her into it. She had posed for them, some had been printed, and she had not objected at the time. The photographer would not gain much, for the supply of women in bathtubs exceeded the demand. But, by creating a buzz, she sent out a message to those who mattered – the filmmakers – that she had no qualms about posing in such a manner. She had to rescue her soap bubble existence.

It is not difficult to understand the extent people will go to in order to become automated products in phantom factories. It is a cruel world and they unknowingly make it even more cruel by sleeping with the nightmare. Often, the women hang on to men, sometimes to further their career or to portray themselves as a hit pair or to enhance self-esteem.

***


In Heroine a desperate Mahi, hands shakily holding cigarettes, liquor glasses, pills, eyes glazed with self-pity, is addicted to love. She clings to it and when she is tossed out like a squashed insect, its hair-like feet still writhing with life, she does not hesitate to use her private moments. She tells her PR agent to leak out the love-making clip with her star boyfriend. Had she captured it as a keepsake, or did she instinctively know that the only way to keep people was to be ready to risk losing them?

It happens with madams in brothels who were once prostitutes. They sting back at the new girls and the pimps with a mixture of benevolence and cunning. They are recreating their misery. The masochism psychologically scars them.

Heroine’s director Madhur Bhandarkar has created some caricatures. There is also pop psychology about people from broken homes and he is not as harsh on men. In a way, this works because the female star’s loneliness comes across more poignantly. She is leading an LSD existence, hallucinating about herself. Bollywood has amplified her persona, so when she sees it reduced in the bedroom or when her mouth tastes dust from the street, she internalises these as her own flaws. 

Clark Gable, who had a number of famous Hollywood stars as conquests, said he preferred prostitutes. “Because they go away and keep their mouths shut. The others stay around, want a bit of romance, movie lovemaking.”

He was expected to recreate in his bedroom what he had done under the arclights. That is the fantasy many of them begin to believe. And they try out various ruses on fading magic carpets.

Mahi, beaten and defeated, leaves for autumnal Europe where she can deny who she is. Is there really any escape? The Bollywood she was a part of thrives on killing identities. It is always synthetic spring here.

Published in Express Tribune, Sept 29

- - -

Also an old post here: The Fedora in us 

11.11.08

Trapped by cliches?

I have always believed that clichés become clichés because they express sentiments or reality continually. Language has given us the ability to use these in fascinating ways or in contexts they are not used in often.

The demonising of clichés has made simple words into a stuttering heap of convoluted phrases. Genuine intent becomes suspect. Take the word interesting. One may find something interesting, that is holding interest, remarkable, exciting, worthy of note, even motivating.

However, one has been told that when you don’t have anything to say about a work just call it interesting. Such a fiend it has been transformed into that I shudder when receiving it as a comment or a compliment.

These thoughts are a response to a report in The Telegraph that mentions such phrases in the English language that gets people all riled up.

The top ten most irritating phrases according to the book:

  1. At the end of the day
  2. Fairly unique
  3. I personally
  4. At this moment in time
  5. With all due respect
  6. Absolutely
  7. It's a nightmare
  8. Shouldn't of
  9. 24/7
  10. It's not rocket science

The reference is to their wrong or loose usage. There would be occasions, though, when such phrases convey just what they are.

There is an at the end of the day, which is night.

And while uniqueness cannot be measured, so fairly unique seems off, there are yardsticks where we do think of better than the best which should properly be the end of the measure.

I personally is careless, but think about the possibility of the one uttering it as taking responsibility twice over!

Is there something drastically wrong with at this moment in time? If so, then we must cringe at the constant reference to now.

With all due respect is of course worth a smile. It reveals and revels in obsequiousness. If it is said with a dash of sarcasm, it might make mincemeat of the one it is addressed to.

It’s a nightmare is often used for anything other than a nightmare, therefore it could possibly take on metaphorical connotations.

It’s not rocket science. I suppose rocket science is hugely difficult to fathom, although it is not quantum physics would work as well with me. Absolutely!

- - -

The friend who sent me this link added in his note:

“Do you want to try a search for these phrases on your blog? I bet that you'll get zero or nearly zero on most counts. You are too creative to use clichés."

I replied:

You'd be surprised but I don't even need to check.

I personally feel at the end of the day you cannot be fairly unique 24/7. It's a nightmare absolutely and at this moment in time it is not rocket science.

With all due respect ;)

~F

More seriously, one looks for and tries to not fall into the cliché trap, but if the effort shows then it is one more example of words flexing their muscles. Words with a toned body are nice; watching them sweat it out in a gym is not.