Doctored CDs are not new. So, the latest news that the conversations between Mulayam Singh Yadav, Amar Singh and Shanti Bhushan have been tampered with is not so surprising.
The conversations implicated Shanti Bhushan and his son of getting a prime plot in Noida for a pittance. There was an RTI query. The response was this:
"Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL), Chandigarh’s report has been made public for the first time in response to an RTI query. The conclusion of the report was that the CD was “not original and it is a post production edited version”. CFSL, Delhi and CERT-In had said the CD was original."
The two reports are now seen as wrong and Prshant Bhushan says it is not only the Delhi police’s dishonesty, but a move by the government to hijack the anti-corruption movement.
A few devil’s advocate type questions:
1. Why is the last report to be considered sacrosanct? Or will there be a call for another one?
2. Will this exonerate Amar Singh and Mulayam Singh Yadav as well, or will they be the culprits?
3. Does this mean that a first report is never authentic and the process of inquiry will as a matter of course depend on second and third and maybe more opinions?
4. If the Delhi police gave a wrong report, can they be tried for it or will it be seen as human error?
5. Will this set the precedent for everyone who has been tapped and taped in other cases to plead innocence?
6. Can other areas become an open ground, say, in cases of brain mapping?
It is unfortunate that there is politics in every case. This matter should go to court and not just become one more thing that will be debated in every panel discussion.
I am a bit curious about the timing, though. Anna Hazare and Company are back on the road with their tamasha. So, if the government did not release the report, must we assume that the RTI queries have more power than the government and inspire tremendous skills to detect “signs of proficient editing” as well as bring out honesty in the most corrupt heart?
- - -
For a flashback: Cool Bhushan, Hot Air
For an aside: Amar Singh and Draupadi
The conversations implicated Shanti Bhushan and his son of getting a prime plot in Noida for a pittance. There was an RTI query. The response was this:
"Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL), Chandigarh’s report has been made public for the first time in response to an RTI query. The conclusion of the report was that the CD was “not original and it is a post production edited version”. CFSL, Delhi and CERT-In had said the CD was original."
The two reports are now seen as wrong and Prshant Bhushan says it is not only the Delhi police’s dishonesty, but a move by the government to hijack the anti-corruption movement.
“The interest taken by the Home Minister P. Chidambaram in this matter and the PMO in revealing the Delhi CSFL report while withholding the Chandigarh CFSL report shows that the government is behind the dissemination of this fabrication, if not the actual fabrication itself."
A few devil’s advocate type questions:
1. Why is the last report to be considered sacrosanct? Or will there be a call for another one?
2. Will this exonerate Amar Singh and Mulayam Singh Yadav as well, or will they be the culprits?
3. Does this mean that a first report is never authentic and the process of inquiry will as a matter of course depend on second and third and maybe more opinions?
4. If the Delhi police gave a wrong report, can they be tried for it or will it be seen as human error?
5. Will this set the precedent for everyone who has been tapped and taped in other cases to plead innocence?
6. Can other areas become an open ground, say, in cases of brain mapping?
It is unfortunate that there is politics in every case. This matter should go to court and not just become one more thing that will be debated in every panel discussion.
I am a bit curious about the timing, though. Anna Hazare and Company are back on the road with their tamasha. So, if the government did not release the report, must we assume that the RTI queries have more power than the government and inspire tremendous skills to detect “signs of proficient editing” as well as bring out honesty in the most corrupt heart?
- - -
For a flashback: Cool Bhushan, Hot Air
For an aside: Amar Singh and Draupadi
All very valid questions...pray, who has the answers....Mighty Arnab Babu? throw some light.
ReplyDeleteTrue, Alka. The questions are the answers many a time. But who wants questions when the light is all about flashing bulbs?
ReplyDelete